When employing “the majority of scientists say so” argument for evolution, the evolutionist never seems to prove this statement with hard data.
And even if the majority of scientists do in fact believe in evolution, this argument as a basis for rejecting Creationism reduces to absurdity.
Evolutionists often argue that (macro) evolution is a clear scientific fact, and then, without proving this with science, shift to arguing for evolution’s “factuality” on the basis that “the majority of scientists say so.” And so one minute he argues the basis for truth is naturalistic science, and the next, the basis of truth is scientist mob rule.
This is not surprising. Evolutionists have no scientific evidence for evolution; thus, their equivocation from science to scientists is understandable, albeit dishonest.
Pluralists constantly argue, “Don’t impose your views on me!” But this is sheer hypocrisy, since this argument is itself an imposition of a view. And so the pluralist imposes on others his view that views shouldn’t be imposed.
